An Associated Press story quoted Chuck Pelkie, a spokesman for State's Attorney James Glasgow's office, “It wasn't until investigators fully analyzed Dorian's computer on Tuesday that they concluded it was impossible for him to have been the shooter.” This digital evidence was processed by Sherriff Paul Kaupas’ High Tech Crimes Unit working around the clock for the last four days analyzing Dorian’s computer.
At a court hearing that lasted less than five minutes, charges against Dorian were formally dropped.
The Chicago Tribune quoted Glasgow, “Sheriff's investigators found evidence that the computer was in use at a time that would have made impossible for the person using it -- Dorian -- to be there at the time of the shootings.” Glasgow also said, “In this particular case, I guess Brian Dorian can thank God for computer technology.”
The case exemplifies how the proper handling of digital evidence, EnCase® forensic methodology and technology and a trained and certified forensic examiner, can lead to a successful case outcome. EnCase® Forensic helps courts worldwide uncover the truth -- guilt or innocence. In cases where time is an important element of a case, using a tool that maintains the integrity of the evidence by allowing an examiner to analyze a computer user’s activity without altering access dates and times is important.
Deep forensic analysis can mean the difference between guilt and innocence. Learn more about EnCase® forensic technology and forensic training.
No comments :
Post a Comment